Geography been studied it might, with all its errors, have tended to
some greater endeavours after accuracy. Roger Bacon, whilst lamenting
the exceeding deficiency of geographical knowledge in the Latin
world, and purposing to essay an exacter distribution of countries,
says he will not attempt to do so by latitude and longitude, for that
is a system of which the Latins have learned nothing. He himself,
whilst still somewhat burdened by the authoritative dicta of “saints
and sages” of past times, ventures at least to criticise some of the
latter, such as Pliny and Ptolemy, and declares his intention to
have recourse to the information of those who have travelled most
extensively over the Earth’s surface. And judging from the good use
he makes, in his description of the northern parts of the world, of
the Travels of Rubruquis, whom he had known and questioned, besides
diligently studying his narrative,[7] we might have expected much in
Geography from this great man, had similar materials been available
to him for other parts of the earth. He did attempt a map with
mathematical determination of places, but it has not been preserved.[8]
It may be said with general truth that the world-maps current up
to the end of the 13th century had more analogy to the mythical
cosmography of the Hindus than to any thing properly geographical.
Both, no doubt, were originally based in the main on real features. In
the Hindu cosmography these genuine features are symmetrised as in a
kaleidoscope; in the European cartography they are squeezed together in
a manner that one can only compare to a pig in brawn. Here and there
some feature strangely compressed and distorted is just recognisable.
A splendid example of this kind of map is that famous one at Hereford,
executed about A.D. 1275, of which a facsimile has lately been
published, accompanied by a highly meritorious illustrative Essay.[9]