throughout their progress, is by no means an invariable circumstance.
Still less is it distinctive; for many diseases are marked by great
uniformity of symptoms. It has been enumerated nevertheless among the
general characters of poisoning, because, although its presence can
hardly ever add any weight to the evidence in favour of death by poison,
its absence may sometimes afford even positive proof in favour of
natural death. That is, changes of a certain kind occurring in the
symptoms during their progress may be incompatible with the known
effects of a particular poison or of all poisons, and capable of being
accounted for only on the supposition of natural disease having been at
least the ultimate cause of death. This statement, which is one of some
importance, is illustrated by a pointed case, that of Charles Munn,
mentioned at the close of the present section.